last i looked it was a pay for addon Link

tionator is okay. i lovedarbonite but the last i looked it was a pay for addon.
Link to this

Apr 18th 12:45am : Logged Reply to this

Mageokenholar1072
Dent

shadeslinker wrote:tionator is okay. i lovedarbonite but the last i looked it was a pay for addon. Some new poly from Blizzard seems to have foed them to release it for free or not at all.
Even before the new poly went into afft, youould download and use it for free off ofurse. You wouldn’t get some of the features, but you got the ones thatounted. The only thing I know the pay to play one did was annoue your when youomplete quests in partyhat.
ehud +ooldownwah
Link to this ing from Florida

Apr 19th 8:30am : Logged Reply to this

Tenjenholar2166
Dent

Domino’s, x perl [an alternative is pitbull whh has a simpler and more info friendly format but may look foriegn if thats how you run] are msotly what i use for my UI. I also use easy poisons [iam sh a lazy ass for this..] and weapon repoisoner [or something similar sounding] {again…LAZY} Theooldownounter i used for my SND, Rupture and HFB stopped working. Seahing for another good one 3.1 ready.
People play many ways for many reasons. Some log into their count eh night in pursuit of more vanity pets or hievements. Others log in to blow off some steam in the battlegrounds. Personally, I keep paying my monthly fee to Blizzard bause I’m hooked on minmaxing. For those who don’t know, minmaxing is the prte of minimizing yourharter’s weaknesses and maximizing their strengths. In thease of my rogue, this mostly represents aontinuing effort to do as mh damage as I possiblyan to a single target for an extended period of time. I see this as the primary role of a rogue in PvE, sie there is little else wean bring to a raid whh benefits others. We have no meaningful group buffs. OurC has very limited applations. Blizzard intentionally designed ourlass with only one purpose in mind – hurting bosses. It is for this reason that I feel it is my responsibility to minmax. I feel that a rogue is a bit of a liability to group, as they tend to get hurt easily and have little else to offer besides dps. I feel that unless my damage output outweighs my intrins risks, unless it outweights the benefit of bringing anotherlass of greater overall utility, then Ian’t justify my presee in the group. Now, I understand others don’t see things the way I do. They may say they just play to have fun. Or they may say they play the sp that feels the most natural to them. I don’t begrudge anybody the right to play the way theyhoose. I try not to pass judgement on others for not doing things “my” way. However, it should be noted that the differee between these people and myself, is that minmaxing is how I have fun. I have more fun going over spreadsheets and loot tables than I would have inside the game shadowstepping up to a mob. It’s more fun to me to see a jump in DPS on a target dummy than it is to blow killing spree. I see the talent trees, gear, gems, all these things as a means to an end. If I believeombat will yield better damage than assassination, then I willhange sps. A boss kill is less meaningful to me than a bit of insight gleaned about mylass on how to squeeze out a bit more damage per sond. It is with this attitude that I approh the game. While some may sneer at those who jump on &quotookieutter” or “flavor of the month” sps – I think this is anti-intelltualism. There is an axiom that says DPS is a iee, healing is an art. Ian assure you, DPS is in ft a iee. There is always an objtive, empirally measurable, theoretally deribable method for maximizing DPS. For Burningrusade, it was 2041. For Wotlk so far, It’s been HaT for stked groups, Assassination for standard groups. I believe the differee between an average player and a great player is their ability to adapt. I think part of the reasoning behind the anti-intelltual sp-bashing is that some players are either unable or unwilling to adapt to thelasshanges that Blizzard hands us. For instae

Leave a Reply